- Published on
 
Poems on Subjects in the Old Testament. Part I. Genesis-Exodus
- Authors
 
- Name
 - afterwards ALEXANDER HOOK (Cecil Francis)
 - @search?q=afterwards ALEXANDER HOOK (Cecil Francis)
 

Exodus Part I - A Comparison of the Biblical and Quranic Versions
Overview
- Title: Exodus Part I
 - Focus: Comparative study of the Exodus story in the Bible and Quran.
 
Key Themes
- Comparison of Narratives: Examines differences between the Biblical and Quranic versions of the Exodus.
 - Analysis of Episodes: Detailed comparison of major episodes in both texts.
 - Contradictions and Historical Analysis: Critical examination of the Biblical account, highlighting inconsistencies.
 
Detailed Insights
Context and Objective
- First part of a trilogy exploring the Exodus narrative.
 - Aims to compare Biblical and Quranic versions, setting the stage for further historical and analytical exploration.
 
Key Differences
- Identifies variations in storytelling and logical coherence.
 - Bible: Detailed but contains inconsistencies.
 - Quran: Less detailed but more coherent.
 
Major Episodes
- Comparative analysis of:
- Arrival of Israelites in Egypt.
 - Birth and life of Moses.
 - Oppression by the Pharaoh.
 - Plagues and escape.
 - Reception of commandments.
 
 
- Comparative analysis of:
 Historical and Logical Inconsistencies
- Highlights issues in the Biblical account, such as the number of Israelites and sequence of events.
 - Suggests Quranic version avoids these inconsistencies.
 
Concluding Thoughts
- Suggests the Biblical version of Exodus is problematic.
 - Advocates for a reconsideration of the narrative, hinting at the Quranic version as a more coherent alternative.
 
Author's Perspective
- Appears to favor the Quranic narrative for its consistency.
 - Encourages a critical reassessment of the Biblical Exodus story.
 
